Motion on clutter (email 2 of 3)
Fri, 3 Apr at 18:40
All,
The Motion on clutter received a modest number of responses, split between those supporting (without substantive comment) and those challenging some or all of it (with comments). Here is a flavour of some of the comments:
- Not all plot holders have sheds, or sheds large enough, in which they can keep all the inorganic material that they have and that they may need to use at various times during the year.
- The definition of what is “rubbish” is subjective. For example one person’s scrap wood is, to another person, part of the compost bin they are planning to build. Any action the Committee may take on such items could therefore cause disagreement.
- Man-made material is highly valuable. For example, plastic may be useful to line raised beds with plastic. Weed membrane is used by many Members particularly, but by no means only, during the winter. Tyres are effective in holding down weed membrane.
- Often the problem is caused by departing plot holders. The new tenant is left with the burden of removing their predecessor’s debris (sometimes involving considerable effort and/or cost).
The Committee and the proposer, after considering all the responses, have decided NOT to take the motion to a vote. We judged that there were differences not so much of opinion (although there were some) but of understanding: this is one of the weaknesses of a virtual AGM. The proposer did not have the opportunity fully to explain the intention of the motion and to answer questions. That intention was not to oppose the use of man-made material, but to encourage people to deal with what appeared to be a lot of waste material, broken structures etc. This is what the Committee supported.
To be clear, the Committee agrees that man-made material is highly useful to the average plot holder. We also agree that departing plot holders can be a main cause of difficulties (and we are now being much more pro-active in pursuing ex-plot holders who leave material behind), but these people typically have allowed scrap material to build up, structures to fall into ruin, etc, and then face a difficult challenge when they leave: it would be much better if everyone keeps their plots tidy and free of anything that is not needed in the current growing season.
So, we urge all Members to take a fresh look at their plot and decide what they really need and what they could take to the tip when circumstances allow. Let’s all do our bit to ensure that our sites remain pleasant and attractive places for everyone to enjoy.
We have an existing plot inspection regime that covers much of this territory. Inspections are suspended at the moment, and we will need to re-introduce them carefully, as some plot holders are currently just not able to tend to their plots. But details of how plot inspections work are available on our website.
Kind regards,
TAA/TAL Committee